lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Development tree, PLEASE?
From
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:29:44PM -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> Why not just drop the "2"? It's not like the "2" is going anywhere
> with current or even with the past development models. 2.X.Y has
> already been used (for X = 0-6 and modest Y), so 6.16.1 could be used
> instead of 2.6.16-rc1.

Just want to make clear, I wasn't taking about reusing 2.0, 2.1 ..
but just continue from 2.6 as the following example:

2.6.16 => 2.7.0
2.6.16.1 => 2.7.1
2.6.16.2 => 2.7.2
2.6.17 => 2.8.0
2.6.18 => 2.9.0
...

The development model stays exactly the same:
i.e. 2.X.0 kernels are released every ~N weeks by Linus.

--
Vincent Hanquez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-23 14:47    [W:0.140 / U:2.396 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site