![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:15:23 +0100 (CET), Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote: > i.e., if (!urb->completion) urb->status is not set, so, depending on > whether the urb has ->completion either the old or the new status will be > tested. Is this really correct? And a couple lines above that "goto > recycle;" is superfluous... I would not recommend to get too excercised over uhci-hcd in 2.4.32. I do not with to touch it, because it mostly works, and the risk of regressions is too great. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-22 07:30 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||