Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:57:19 -0700 | From | Michael Loftis <> | Subject | Re: Development tree, PLEASE? |
| |
--On January 21, 2006 11:51:28 PM +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at> wrote:
> And the more the development head proceeds from the "stable" one, the > more work is it to "backport" some hardware driver IMHO. Especially if > "stability" is a primary concern.
Yes, I realise all of this. But everyone seems to get this damned territorial attitude that I want to see kernel development stopped, quite the opposite. All I want to see is a stable target for certain windows of time. So that way when bugs are fixed that are trivial there's a place to go without upgrading scads of userland stuff or worrying about lots of unrelated change.
> > Bernd > -- > Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ > mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 > Embedded Linux Development and Services > > > >
-- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |