![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
--On January 21, 2006 11:51:28 PM +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at> wrote: > And the more the development head proceeds from the "stable" one, the > more work is it to "backport" some hardware driver IMHO. Especially if > "stability" is a primary concern. Yes, I realise all of this. But everyone seems to get this damned territorial attitude that I want to see kernel development stopped, quite the opposite. All I want to see is a stable target for certain windows of time. So that way when bugs are fixed that are trivial there's a place to go without upgrading scads of userland stuff or worrying about lots of unrelated change. > > Bernd > -- > Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ > mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 > Embedded Linux Development and Services > > > > -- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-22 10:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||