![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Ack'ed-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com> > > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 02:00 +0900, Jerome Pinot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > >It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on > > >"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY). > > > > This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one > > applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1. > > > > from: Rui Saraiva > > > > tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva <rmps@mail.pt> > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot <ngc891@gmail.com> No, this patch shouldn't be needed once we have the suitable security stubs in place. See ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm2/broken-out/tpm_bios-needs-more-securityfs_-functions.patch ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm2/broken-out/tpm_bios-securityfs-error-checking-fix.patch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-22 08:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||