[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPL V3 and Linux
    On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Alexander Shishckin wrote:
    > On 1/21/06, Chase Venters <> wrote:
    > > On Friday 20 January 2006 20:27, Alexander Shishckin wrote:
    > > > GPLv3 tends to get on top of the most braindead things ever known to
    > > > software development. It is, in fact, a one-too-many example of how a
    > > > person who cannot be seriously considered to be a computer programmer
    > > > tries to have his one-too-many revenge on companies which employ real
    > > > software developers and produce real world software. Someone should
    > > > probably put an end to these miserable efforts.
    > >
    > > Why does everyone assume that Stallman is out to 'get revenge' on companies?
    > > Is his desire for freedom so hard to grasp and believe that all you can do is
    > > spin it into silly conspiracies?
    > Ain't that obvoius? Every second word that you read in GPLs is either
    > 'freedom' or 'share' and the rest of the document has absolutely
    > nothing to do with both, just restricting our *freedom* to *share*.

    The problem with `just sharing' is that some people are only interested in the
    `receiving' part of sharing, so unfortunately you need some extra legal stuff
    in the license to make sure everyone plays fair.



    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-21 20:03    [W:0.020 / U:48.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site