Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:27:38 +0300 | From | Alexander Shishckin <> | Subject | Re: GPL V3 and Linux |
| |
On 1/20/06, Jeff V. Merkey <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> wrote: > Cudos to Stallman, The patent retaliation clause is exactly what has > been missing. The inclusion of custom binaries was a little vague, but > the net of it is that the end user can combine the separate parts, and > have the freedom to do so given the GPL3 terms. Any concensus on > whether Linux will move to GPL3? I support adoption and congrats to > Stallman -- A++++. GPLv3 tends to get on top of the most braindead things ever known to software development. It is, in fact, a one-too-many example of how a person who cannot be seriously considered to be a computer programmer tries to have his one-too-many revenge on companies which employ real software developers and produce real world software. Someone should probably put an end to these miserable efforts.
-- I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |