![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:49:44 -0700 > "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> wrote: > >> Cudos to Stallman, The patent retaliation clause is exactly what has >> been missing. The inclusion of custom binaries was a little vague, but >> the net of it is that the end user can combine the separate parts, and >> have the freedom to do so given the GPL3 terms. Any concensus on >> whether Linux will move to GPL3? > > No consensus exists, and it would require agreement from all the copyright > holders. > I don't think the kernel is going to move to v3, it's licensed specifically as v2, this is from the top of COPYING: > Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel > is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not > v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated. Also, given that several of the copyright holders in the kernel are dead, I don't think we will be able to obtain permission. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-20 20:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||