Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:46:49 +0200 | From | Pekka Enberg <> | Subject | Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ? |
| |
Hi,
On 12/30/05, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > Attached is a variant that was refreshed against 2.6.15-rc7 and fixes > the logical bug that your compile error fix made ;) > > It should be cachep->objsize not csizep->cs_size.
Isn't there any other way to do this patch other than making kzalloc() and kstrdup() inline? I would like to see something like this in the mainline but making them inline is not acceptable because they increase kernel text a lot.
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |