[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    On 12/28/05, Andreas Kleen <> wrote:
    > I remember the original slab paper from Bonwick actually mentioned that
    > power of two slabs are the worst choice for a malloc - but for some reason Linux
    > chose them anyways.

    Power of two sizes are bad because memory accesses tend to concentrate
    on the same cache lines but slab coloring should take care of that. So
    I don't think there's a problem with using power of twos for kmalloc()

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-02 09:44    [W:0.029 / U:42.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site