[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
On 12/28/05, Andreas Kleen <> wrote:
> I remember the original slab paper from Bonwick actually mentioned that
> power of two slabs are the worst choice for a malloc - but for some reason Linux
> chose them anyways.

Power of two sizes are bad because memory accesses tend to concentrate
on the same cache lines but slab coloring should take care of that. So
I don't think there's a problem with using power of twos for kmalloc()

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-02 09:44    [W:0.083 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site