Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:09:29 +0200 | From | Pekka Enberg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response |
| |
Hi,
Trond Myklebust wrote: > > /* > > * Tasks that have marked their sleep as noninteractive get > > * woken up without updating their sleep average. (i.e. their > > * sleep is handled in a priority-neutral manner, no priority > > * boost and no penalty.) > > */ > > > > This appears to be the only documentation for the TASK_NONINTERACTIVE > > flag,
On 12/23/05, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > I guess it makes to many assumptions about the reader's prior knowledge > of the scheduler internals. I'll try to make it clearer.
FWIW, Ingo invented TASK_NONINTERACTIVE to fix a problem I had with Wine. See the following threads for further discussion:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111729237700002&r=1&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111761183900001&r=1&w=2
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |