![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:46:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.15-rc7 compared to 2.6.14. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you was declared guilty for a breakage or in any other way involved > with one or more of these issues. [ . . . ] > Subject : BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/18/95 > Submitter : Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> > Handled-By : "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> > Status : unknown, reported against -mm, already fixed in -mm > (make-rcu-task_struct-safe-for-oprofile.patch) > Is this bug present in Linus' tree? No, this bug is not present in Linus's tree. Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-02 20:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||