Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions | From | Ochal Christophe <> | Date | Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:30:36 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 18:38 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Monday 02 January 2006 18:23, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Would you veto against a section "known regressions" in the final 2.6.15 > > announcement listing this issue with a link to the Bugzilla bug? > > Yes for this case. The original was likely so fragile that it might > break only with minor changes in the hardware configuration. > > In general listing known regressions is a good idea though. > > It might be a good idea to give them different priorities though - e.g. > a broken BIOS with a missing workaround is less priority than > a pure Linux bug.
I'm currently struggling with a probable case of broken BIOS without workaround, is there a central repository of known simular problems? Is there a way to pinpoint such problems to prevent people from tossing these into bugzilla?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |