![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:19 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote: > Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better > in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100: > > e100 caused a periodic latency of about 500 microseconds > exactly every 2 seconds, no matter what the load on the interface > was (i.e. even on an idle interface). > > eepro100 did not show any latencies that long, it worked much > smoother w.r.t. latencies. > > Of course I would prefer to have e100 fixed over keeping eepro100 > around forever, but the last time I checked, it still wasn't fixed. Please provide latency traces to illustrate the problematic code path. It sounds like you have known about this issue for a while, were you waiting for it to fix itself? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-19 08:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||