lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectMy vote against eepro* removal
    Date
    From
    Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better 
    in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100:

    e100 caused a periodic latency of about 500 microseconds
    exactly every 2 seconds, no matter what the load on the interface
    was (i.e. even on an idle interface).

    eepro100 did not show any latencies that long, it worked much
    smoother w.r.t. latencies.

    Of course I would prefer to have e100 fixed over keeping eepro100
    around forever, but the last time I checked, it still wasn't fixed.

    Klaus Kusche
    Entwicklung Software - Steuerung
    Software Development - Control

    KEBA AG
    A-4041 Linz
    Gewerbepark Urfahr
    Tel +43 / 732 / 7090-3120
    Fax +43 / 732 / 7090-6301
    E-Mail: kus@keba.com
    www.keba.com


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-19 08:22    [W:0.019 / U:1.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site