Messages in this thread | | | Subject | My vote against eepro* removal | Date | Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:19:37 +0100 | From | "kus Kusche Klaus" <> |
| |
Last time I tested (around 2.6.12), eepro100 worked much better in -rt kernels w.r.t. latencies than e100:
e100 caused a periodic latency of about 500 microseconds exactly every 2 seconds, no matter what the load on the interface was (i.e. even on an idle interface).
eepro100 did not show any latencies that long, it worked much smoother w.r.t. latencies.
Of course I would prefer to have e100 fixed over keeping eepro100 around forever, but the last time I checked, it still wasn't fixed.
Klaus Kusche Entwicklung Software - Steuerung Software Development - Control
KEBA AG A-4041 Linz Gewerbepark Urfahr Tel +43 / 732 / 7090-3120 Fax +43 / 732 / 7090-6301 E-Mail: kus@keba.com www.keba.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |