Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:40:34 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ... |
| |
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Davide Libenzi wrote: >>> The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend >>> the event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The >>> definition of pepoll_wait is: [...] >> >> I definitely ACK this patch, it's needed for the same reasons we need >> pselect and ppoll. >> > > It busts most architectures. > > fs/eventpoll.c: In function `sys_pepoll_wait': > fs/eventpoll.c:727: error: `TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK' undeclared (first use in this function) > > It seems that the preferred way to fix this is to sprinkle #ifdef > TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK all over the code.
Hey, I've written in the comments that it depends on the TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK bits ;) The latest one that dwmw posted used such feature, so I though to align epoll bits to that too.
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |