lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 17 Jan 2006 20:01:22 +1100
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: Race in new page migration code?
Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>OK (either way is fine), but you should still drop the __isolate_lru_page
>>>nonsense and revert it like my patch does.
>>
>>Ok with me. Magnus: You needed the __isolate_lru_page for some other
>>purpose. Is that still the case?
> 
> 
> It made sense to have it broken out when it was used twice within
> vmscan.c, but now when the patch changed a lot and the function is
> used only once I guess the best thing is to inline it as Nick
> suggested. I will re-add it myself later on when I need it. Thanks.
> 
> / magnus
> 

I'm curious, what do you need it for?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-17 10:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008