Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:06:45 +0100 | | From | Philippe Elie <> | | Subject | Re: make "struct d_cookie" dependable on CONFIG_PROFILING? |
| |
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 at 10:27 +0000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Is there any good reason for not making "struct dcookie_struct > *d_cookie" dependable on CONFIG_PROFILING? > > Shrinks "struct dentry" from 128 bytes to 124 on x86, allowing > 31 objects per slab instead of 30. > > John Levon informed me that he had such selection in his > original patches, but was asked but take it off (?).
iirc this was seen usefull by other tools than profiler but fs/Makefile contains:
obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += dcookies.o
and nobody complained agaisnt it.
-- regards, Philippe Elie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |