Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:32:27 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 9/11] UML - Implement soft interrupts |
| |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host?
Delay vs a UML without the patch.
> A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU patch? > I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I just > remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask manipulations.
It was separate from VCPU, but I never really looked at it since I already had this. Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I should use.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |