lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [uml-devel] [PATCH 9/11] UML - Implement soft interrupts
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host?

Delay vs a UML without the patch.

> A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU patch?
> I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I just
> remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask manipulations.

It was separate from VCPU, but I never really looked at it since I already
had this. Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I should
use.

Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-17 03:43    [W:0.437 / U:1.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site