![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> OK, suit yourself. >>> >>> Anyway, there was no need to get so defensive - Arjan was just telling >>> you that it's not up to the kernel developers when reiser4 gets in, it's >>> up the the reiser4 developers when they submit it in a mergeable state >>> (they know what that is), so you should ask the reiser4 people when they >>> plan to do that. >>> >>> Lee >>> >>> >>> >> I just asked a question. Obviously it's a question that seems to >> politically hot to handle. I didn't realize reiser 4 was a prohibited >> subject. >> > > please stop trolling. > > I gave you a polite answer that the exact same question was asked > recently, and answered. If you are then too lazy to go look in the > archive even then..... ok here is it: > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0601.0/1840.html > > I even pointed out a mailinglist that's best suited for detailed > follow-on questions. > > Your "political" and other crap you're spewing here shows that you're > not actually interested in the answer, but just want to start a > flamewar. THAT is not reasonable on linux-kernel. If you want to start a > flamewar at least do it for a technical topic/reason. > > I just asked a simple question about what the status of a merge was. No one has responded to my question yet. All I'm hearing is that Reiser 4 is a prohibited subject. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-15 16:14 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||