![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Con Kolivas wrote: > On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Ideally, balancing should be completely unaffected when all tasks are >>of priority 0 which is what I thought yours did, and why I think the >>current system is not great. > > > The current smp nice in mainline 2.6.15 is performance neutral when all are > the same priority. It's only this improved version in -mm that is not. > Oh sure. I wasn't talking about performance though. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-14 07:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||