![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matt Helsley (on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:26:08 -0800) wrote: >On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 14:29 +1100, Keith Owens wrote: >> An alternative patch that requires no locks and does not even require >> RCU is in http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113392370322545&w=2 >> > > Interesting. Might the 'inuse' flags suffer from bouncing due to false >sharing? It would, but that was the least of my worries. Algorithm correctness first, then tune it. If necessary it could be converted to a per cpu variable, as long as the timing between creating the per cpu variables and invoking callbacks from hotplug cpu was correct. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-12 06:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||