Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:33:19 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] Fix problems on multi-TB filesystem and file |
| |
"Takashi Sato" <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp> wrote: > > This is a patch to add blkcnt_t as the type of inode.i_blocks. > This enables you to make the size of blkcnt_t either 4 bytes or 8 bytes > on 32 bits architecture with CONFIG_LSF.
What was the rationale behind CONFIG_LSF? It's a bit of an ugly thing and I'm wondering if we wouldn't be better off just removing it and simply fixing >2TB support for all .configs?
Do the common userspace tools need to be updated for this, or do they already get it right? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |