lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/01] Move Exit Connectors
Date
"Paul E. McKenney" (on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:51:15 -0800) wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:19:01PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
>> OK, I have thought about it and ...
>>
>> notifier_call_chain_lockfree() must be called with preempt disabled.
>>
>Fair enough! A comment, perhaps? In a former life I would have also
>demanded debug code to verify that preemption/interrupts/whatever were
>actually disabled, given the very subtle nature of any resulting bugs...

Comment - OK. Debug code is not required, the reference to
smp_processor_id() already does all the debug checks that
notifier_call_chain_lockfree() needs. CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG is your
friend.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-12 08:53    [W:0.083 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site