Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-mm2 | From | Alan Hourihane <> | Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:03:32 +0000 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:37 +0000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > > Another one that advertises no AGP capabilities. > > > In this situation you shouldn't *need* agpgart. If it's PCI[E], > > > radeon will use pcigart. > > > > Problem is that i915 depends on DRM && AGP && AGP_INTEL. > > And at the end of i{810,830,915}_dma.c there is the comment: > > "All Intel graphics chipsets are treated as AGP, even if they are > > really PCI-e." > > > > I've cc'ed Alan Hourihane, but from memory the Intel on-board graphics > chips don't advertise the AGP bit on the graphics controllers but work > using AGP... > > I've got an PCIE chipset with Radeon on it, and in that case I could get > away without agpgart...
Dave,
You're probably reading too much into that last statement.
I've never seen a pure PCI-e chipset from Intel (i.e. the ones without integrated graphics) so that may not be true, but the ones with integrated graphics are always treated as AGP based.
Alan.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |