![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Con Kolivas wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:35 pm, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>Martin Bligh wrote: >> >>>>This is a shot in the dark. We haven't confirmed 1. there is a >>>>problem 2. that this is the problem nor 3. that this patch will fix >>>>the problem. I say we wait for the results of 1. If the improved smp >>>>nice handling patch ends up being responsible then it should not be >>>>merged upstream, and then this patch can be tested on top. >>>> >>>>Martin I know your work move has made it not your responsibility to >>>>test backing out this change, but are you aware of anything being >>>>done to test this hypothesis? >> >>OK, backing out that patch seems to fix it. Thanks Andy ;-) > > > Yes thanks! > > I just noticed the result myself and emailed on another branch of this email > thread. Gah It would nice to get a run with the patch back in and my fix applied. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-12 07:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||