lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 11 Jan 2006 15:00:43 +0800
FromCoywolf Qi Hunt <>
SubjectRe: why no -mm git tree?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt <qiyong@fc-cn.com> wrote:
> >> > Why don't use a -mm git tree?> >
> 
> Because everthing would take me 100x longer?

Really? So does Linus?

> > I'm looking into generating a pullable git tree for each -mm.  Just as a
> convenience for people who can't type "ftp".

That doesn't help much if it's only for each -mm.
If you make git commits for each each patch merged in, then
we can always run the `current' -mm git tree.

Test the -mm patches, not leave them sleeping for most of the time.

> > That'll just be a dump of the whole -mm lineup into git.  I don't know how
> workable it'll be - we'll see.> 

-- 
Coywolf Qi Hunt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-11 07:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008