lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Is user-space AIO dead?
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Kenny Simpson wrote:

> Hi,
> Having read the excellent paper by IBM presented at the 2003 OLS about Asynchronous I/O Support
> in Linux 2.5, I found the conclusion rather disappointing:
> "In conclusion, there appears to be no conditions for raw or O_DIRECT access under which AIO can
> show a noticable benefit." - p385.
> http://archive.linuxsymposium.org/ols2003/Proceedings/All-Reprints/Reprint-Pulavarty-OLS2003.pdf
>
> Is this still the case?
>
> If I want a transactional engine (like a database) that needs to persist to stable storage, is it
> still best to use a helper thread to do write/fsync or O_SYNC|O_DIRECT?

Wouldn't nonblocking I/O on regular files be nice?

- D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-11 19:26    [W:0.061 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site