![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Esben Nielsen wrote: > I have done 2 things which might be of interrest: > > I) A rt_mutex unittest suite. It might also be usefull against the generic > mutexes. > > II) I changed the priority inheritance mechanism in rt.c, > optaining the following goals: > Interesting. I'll take a look more at this after I finish dealing with some deadlocks that I found in posix-timers. [snip] > > What am I missing: > Testing on SMP. I have no SMP machine. The unittest can mimic the SMP > somewhat > but no unittest can catch _all_ errors. I have a SMP machine that just freed up. It would be interesting to see how this works on a 8x machine. I'll test it first on my 2x, and when Ingo gets some time he can test it on his big boxes. > > Testing with futexes. > > ALL_PI_TASKS are always switched on now. This is for making the code > simpler. > > My machine fails to run with CONFIG_DEBUG_DEADLOCKS and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT > on at the same time. I need a serial cabel and on consol over serial to > debug it. My screen is too small to see enough there. > > Figure out more tests to run in my unittester. > > So why aren't I doing those things before sending the patch? 1) Well my > girlfriend comes back tomorrow with our child. I know I will have no time to code anything substential > then. 2) I want to make sure Ingo sees this approach before he starts > merging preempt_rt and rt_mutex with his now mainstream mutex. If I get time, I might be able to finish this up, if the changes look decent, and don't cause too much overhead. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-11 18:54 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||