![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:42 am, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >2G/2G is not the only viable alternative. On my 1GB x86 box I'm > >using "lowmem1g" patches for both 2.4 and 2.6, which results in > >2.75G for user-space. I'm sure others have other preferences. > >Any standard option for this should either have several hard-coded > >alternatives, or should support arbitrary values (within reason). > > > >(See http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/*/patch-i386-lowmem1g-* > >if you're interested.) > > Hm, Con Kolivas also provided a lowmem1g patch in his set... I was under the impression that breaking the ABI was a nono and such a patch would never be considered for mainline. Guess I was wrong. However mine only offered a split suitable for 1GB of ram whereas this is offering all that and steak knives too. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-11 01:28 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||