![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 1/1/06, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > > DO YOU REALLY PREFER USERS NOT REPORT BUGS? [...] > So getting back to your question: > I would say that I think it's generally better that bugs that cannot be > reproduced on an untainted kernel are not reported on lkml, but reported > to the vendor of the tainting module instead, simply because it's very > likely that it'll waste precious debug time. Although I like the idea of making the vendors of binary modules really aware of the costs they introduce with regard to debug issues on tainted system, if I was them, the first thing I would say is "contact the vendor of the part of the system that changed", i.e. the kernel. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-01 13:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||