Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:40:37 +0200 | From | "Jan Beulich" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition |
| |
>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> 08.09.05 16:32:16 >>> >On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get >> line wrapped.) >> >> A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. > >Why? They're obviously not needed in kernelspace..
I have dependent code (on STT_COMMON), and am in the process of breaking this up. Since the definition doesn't hurt anyone (and I need it), I can't see why it can't be there; I agree that STT_TLS will rarely be needed in kernel code, but I still decided to also add this for completeness.
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> >> >> diff -Npru 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h >> --- 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2005-08-29 01:41:01.000000000 +0200 >> +++ 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h 2005-03-16 12:24:42.000000000 >> +0100 >> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ typedef __s64 Elf64_Sxword; >> #define STT_FUNC 2 >> #define STT_SECTION 3 >> #define STT_FILE 4 >> +#define STT_COMMON 5 >> +#define STT_TLS 6 >> >> #define ELF_ST_BIND(x) ((x) >> 4) >> #define ELF_ST_TYPE(x) (((unsigned int) x) & 0xf) >>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |