[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

--On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:27:54 -0700 Dave Hansen <> wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat
>> machines. This is essential in order for the distros to support it - same
>> will go for sparsemem.
> That's a different issue. The current code works if you boot a NUMA=y
> SPARSEMEM=y machine with a single node. The current Kconfig options
> also enforce that SPARSEMEM depends on NUMA on i386.
> Magnus would like to enable SPARSEMEM=y while CONFIG_NUMA=n. That
> requires some Kconfig changes, as well as an extra memory present call.
> I'm questioning why we need to do that when we could never do
> DISCONTIG=y while NUMA=n on i386.

Ah, OK - makes more sense. However, some machines do have large holes
in e820 map setups - is not really critical, more of an efficiency


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-07 20:37    [W:0.064 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site