lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: GFS, what's remaining
    On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
    > > +{
    > > + glock_hold(gl);
    > > +}
    > >
    > > eh why?

    On 9/5/05, David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> wrote:
    > You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below. If that's not a
    > accepted technique in the kernel, say so and I'll be happy to change it
    > here and elsewhere.

    Is there a reason why users of gfs2_glock_hold() cannot use
    glock_hold() directly?

    Pekka
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-05 08:35    [W:0.022 / U:118.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site