Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 03 Sep 2005 01:15:21 -0400 | From | Parag Warudkar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick calculation in timer_pm.c |
| |
Lee Revell wrote:
> Are lost ticks really that common? If so, any idea what's disabling > >interrupts for so long (or if it's a hardware issue)? And if not, it >seems like you'd need an artificial way to simulate lost ticks in order >to test this stuff. > >Lee > > Yes - I know many people with laptops who have this lost ticks problem. So no simulation and/or special efforts required. If anyone wants a test bed - my laptop is the perfect instrument.
In my case the rip is always as acpi_processor_idle now a days. Earlier it used to be at acpi_ec_read.
Parag - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |