![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello, > > It could have come a long way since then, but this code looks > > much neater than the code I reviewed. > > I'm glad to hear that! But the cpu resource controller has > some problems, for example: These are issues to be improved. > - The controller only controls the time_slice value and doesn't > care the balance of cpus (the controller leaves balancing to > the existing balancing code in the scheduler). So far I don't > have any good idea to solve this. Is there any problem to enhance load_balance()? Applying some weight to each process, it would be used for calculating load of each runqueue. > - The controller holds a spinlock once per 1 second. I don't > know this is permissive or not, but the current scheduler > doesn't hold any spinlocks normally, so... I think each runqueue has its own spinlock, which is held quite often. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-28 12:16 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||