Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:05:35 +0200 | From | Robert Schwebel <> | Subject | Re: ADI Blackfin porting for kernel-2.6.13 |
| |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:37:59AM +0800, Luke Yang wrote: > We really don't have plan about Blackfin with a MMU now. So do you > beleve it is necessary to change the name to arch/blackfin?
Hmm, as far as I know there are at least plans for variants with memory protection units (but without virtual addressing), but anyway - why put the mmu into the architecture name? If you use "blackfin" you are open to everything and no non dsp guru has to guess what bf might be ;)
Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |