![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 26 September 2005 22:33, Andrew Morton wrote: > john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > This patch should resolve the issue seen in bugme bug #5105, where it > > is assumed that dualcore x86_64 systems have synced TSCs. This is not > > the case, and alternate timesources should be used instead. > > > > For more details, see: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5105 > > > > Andi's earlier concerns that the TSCs should be synced on dualcore > > systems have been resolved by confirmation from AMD folks that they can > > be unsynced. > > OK, thanks - it's good to knock that one over. > > Andi, does this look OK for 2.6.14? Yes. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-27 10:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||