[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
    On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:22 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Last time I looked at the CKRM cpu controller code I found
    > it was quite horrible, with a great deal of duplication and
    > very intrusive large and complex.

    I admit it :)... and that was the reason why we did not post that to

    > It could have come a long way since then, but this code looks

    Since we were not planning to use it there isn't much change in the
    code :(
    > much neater than the code I reviewed.
    > I guess the question of the resource controller stuff is going
    > to come up again sooner or later. I would hope to have just a
    > single CPU resource controller (presumably based on cpusets),
    > the simpler the better ;)

    We were planning to start on a simplified CPU controller that can
    provide the functionalities CKRM is expected to provide.

    As I stated in an earlier email cpusubsets looks promising for CKRM, but
    we are not able to spend more time on it as of now as the team is very
    busy trimming down CKRM.
    > Nick

    Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
    - | may get it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-27 23:49    [W:0.034 / U:16.684 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site