[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:22 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Last time I looked at the CKRM cpu controller code I found
> it was quite horrible, with a great deal of duplication and
> very intrusive large and complex.

I admit it :)... and that was the reason why we did not post that to

> It could have come a long way since then, but this code looks

Since we were not planning to use it there isn't much change in the
code :(
> much neater than the code I reviewed.
> I guess the question of the resource controller stuff is going
> to come up again sooner or later. I would hope to have just a
> single CPU resource controller (presumably based on cpusets),
> the simpler the better ;)

We were planning to start on a simplified CPU controller that can
provide the functionalities CKRM is expected to provide.

As I stated in an earlier email cpusubsets looks promising for CKRM, but
we are not able to spend more time on it as of now as the team is very
busy trimming down CKRM.
> Nick

Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- | may get it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-27 23:49    [W:0.136 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site