![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Zwane, Great news, thanks! I will start testing it, pretty sure I can arrange MSI devices, too. As for your comment about vector allocation policy - allocation on the node where device resides does sound logical to me... Regards, --Natalie > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > Apologies for the long periods between updates, i've been > doing some > > relocating. > > > > Changes since last post: > > > > * Current interrupt handling domain is still on a node > basis, although > > i have moved over to dynamically allocated per cpu IDTs. > > One thing i have to fix here is alignment of cpu_idt_table, > since the per cpu allocator can't guarantee much in that regard. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-26 08:12 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||