[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 01:45 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> > The backward conversion from nsec_t to timespec is almost a non issue.
> > The vast majority of callers dont provide the second argument to
> > nanosleep(), setitimer(), set_timer() which makes the conversion
> > necessary and I think we optimize for the common use case.
> You know very well, that the conversion back to timespec is the killer in
> your calculation. You graciously decide that the "vast majority" doesn't
> want to read the timer, how did you get to that conclusion?

I graciously put instrumentation into _all_ the relevant syscalls on a
desktop and a server machine. The result is that less than 1% of the
calls provide the read back variable.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-25 23:02    [W:0.121 / U:1.544 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site