[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
    On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 01:45 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

    > > The backward conversion from nsec_t to timespec is almost a non issue.
    > > The vast majority of callers dont provide the second argument to
    > > nanosleep(), setitimer(), set_timer() which makes the conversion
    > > necessary and I think we optimize for the common use case.
    > You know very well, that the conversion back to timespec is the killer in
    > your calculation. You graciously decide that the "vast majority" doesn't
    > want to read the timer, how did you get to that conclusion?

    I graciously put instrumentation into _all_ the relevant syscalls on a
    desktop and a server machine. The result is that less than 1% of the
    calls provide the read back variable.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-25 23:02    [W:0.025 / U:114.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site