![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:20:20PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > sysrq t is broken (and stays), > > There's a fix on the way for that. This has nothing to do with interrupt > context anyway. > > > but additionally there are some warnings from > > some commands (enable sleep inside spinlock checking and spinlock debugging), > > which go to the down_read inside handle_page_fault IIRC. So try to run in > > process context. > > Which ones? They should be fixed. > > It is fairly fundamental to sysrq that it work from interrupt context. You > may be diagnosing a system which can't context switch any more. > > This patch should be dropped, and the real problems fixed. > Well Linus has just merged this patch. If you hadn't removed me from the cc yesterday this would not have happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-23 10:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||