Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 06/10] uml: run mconsole "sysrq" in process context | Date | Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:20:20 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 22:50, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote: > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> > > > > Things are breaking horribly with sysrq called in interrupt context. I > > want to try to fix it, but probably this is simpler. To tell the truth, > > sysrq is normally run in interrupt context, so there shouldn't be any > > problem. > > How are they breaking? sysrq t is broken (and stays), but additionally there are some warnings from some commands (enable sleep inside spinlock checking and spinlock debugging), which go to the down_read inside handle_page_fault IIRC. So try to run in process context.
-- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |