[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods.

    > >> The S4 suspend code for PM_DISK_PLATFORM was also calling
    > >> device_shutdown without setting system_state, and was
    > >> not calling the appropriate reboot_notifier.
    > >
    > > ACK on both. But should not you submit patch via -mm, so it gets at
    > > least some testing there?
    > The code is obviously correct, and the people with the problem
    > have reported that this approach solves it.
    > If this bit of functionality is to even work we need to do
    > something like this.
    > So I don't see what benefit putting this in -mm would give. If
    > I was aggressive I would say that this needs to be in 2.6.13.N.
    > If I'm not following some procedure I don't have a problem
    > changing though.

    I think you are not following the proper procedure. All the patches
    should go through akpm.
    Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-21 12:21    [W:0.020 / U:12.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site