![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
on den 21.09.2005 Klokka 10:15 (-0700) skreiv Andrew Morton:
> > + if (PTR_ERR(key_ref) != -EAGAIN) {> > + if (IS_ERR(key_ref))> > + key = key_deref(key_ref);> > + else> > + key = ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(key_ref));> > + break;> > + }> > + }> > That's getting a bit intimate with how IS_ERR and PTR_ERR are implemented
> but I guess we're unlikely to change that.
Shouldn't that test for IS_ERR(key_ref) be inverted?
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-21 17:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||