[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods.
    On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:35:20AM -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > >
    > > I think you are not following the proper procedure. All the patches
    > > should go through akpm.
    > One issue is that I actually worry that Andrew will at some point be where
    > I was a couple of years ago - overworked and stressed out by just tons and
    > tons of patches.
    > Yes, he's written/modified tons of patch-tracking tools, and the git
    > merging hopefully avoids some of the pressures, but it still worries me.
    > If Andrew burns out, we'll all suffer hugely.
    > I'm wondering what we can do to offset those kinds of issues. I _do_ like
    > having -mm as a staging area and catching some problems there, so going
    > through andrew is wonderful in that sense, but it has downsides.

    Morever is severely underworked (acpi being a noteable
    exception) and Andrew has stepped in alot there too. Alot of bugs
    reported on the mailing list are only followed up by Andrew.

    I think he really should receive much more help than he currently does.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-21 19:43    [W:0.022 / U:0.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site