![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ric Wheeler wrote: > As an earlier thread on lkml showed this summer, we still have a long > way to go to getting consistent error semantics in face of media > failures between the various file systems. I am not sure that we even > have consensus on what that default behavior should be between > developers, so image how difficult life is for application writers who > want to try to ride through or write automated "HA" recovery scripts > for systems with large numbers of occasionally flaky IO devices ;-) If you'd like to form a committee to standardize these things, I will ask Vitaly to work with you on that committee, and to have ReiserFS3+4 conform to the standards that result. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-21 02:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||