![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:18:58PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I threw in your new codedrop into a compilation and the byte-order > > mess is _still_ now sorted out. > > Did compiling notice this mess? > We used to compile with C=1. Should we compile somehow else before sending code out? Log is at: http://verein.lst.de/~hch/reiser4.log C=1 with whatever sparse version I had, nevermind what version it is code is not good, just use __le types instead of structs and casting exercises, makes the code simpler and easier to verify. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-19 11:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||