![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:56:14PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > At least reiser4 is smaller. IIRC xfs is older than reiser4 and had more time > to optimize code size, but: > > reiser4 2557872 bytes > xfs 3306782 bytes and romfs is smaller than ext2, damn. Should we remove all filesystems but romfs now? and yeah, if you didn't get the hint compare the feature sets. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-18 12:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||