Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:39:48 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel |
| |
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>additinoal comment is that the code is very messy, very different >from normal kernel style, full of indirections and thus hard to read. >
Most of my customers remark that Namesys code is head and shoulders above the rest of the kernel code. So yes, it is different. In particular, they cite the XFS code as being so incredibly hard to read that its unreadability is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in license fees for me. That's cash received, from persons who read it all, not commentary made idly.
May I suggest that you work on the XFS code instead? Surely with all of this energy you have, you could improve XFS a lot before it gets accepted into the kernel.
As for the indirections, if you figure out how to make VFS indirections easy to follow, the same technique should be applicable to Reiser4, and I will be happy to fix it.
Hans
(Note for the record: I actually think XFS acceptance was delayed too long, and I think that XFS is a great filesystem, but a rhetorical point needed to be made......) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |