![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
izvekov@lps.ele.puc-rio.br wrote: >From what i understand up to now, my problem wasnt that the controller > triggered an interrupt with NIEN set, but that the handler was returning > it as not handled. Essentially that is what happened. Albert's patch simply fixed it another way. ATA is a bit annoying in that, we try to "know" when an interrupt is expected. There is no 100% solution that simply allows us to check for pending interrupts, without side effects. Thus the explosion when unexpected interrupts are received. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-09-16 08:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||